| Selling your photographs to make a little extra side | | | | captivating enough to make people want to |
| money is an appealing idea. But how realistic is it? As | | | | download them, also need to be technically perfect. |
| it turns out, quite realistic, provided that you are not | | | | High resolution images with imperceptible noise levels |
| hoping to get rich doing it. | | | | and perfect color balancing are the minimum technical |
| Let me say right off the bat that if you are hoping | | | | requirements. Get used to shooting at ISO 100, even |
| to get into photography and live off the proceeds of | | | | for low-light shots that require a tripod, mirror lock up |
| your image licensing royalties, that's a whole different | | | | and cable release. |
| ball game. Like every other artist in the world, you | | | | The editors of each exchange will have their own |
| will need an extraordinary game plan and the requisite | | | | standards, of course, and what gets rejected at one |
| talent to bring it off. I cannot help you with that. | | | | site may be accepted elsewhere. So don't give up |
| But if you are already taking pictures on a regular | | | | immediately if you have a door slammed in your face. |
| basis, and at least a fraction of them are very good, | | | | Van Gogh could not convince anyone to buy even |
| then it makes sense to consider licensing them. Like I | | | | one of his paintings in the course of his own lifetime. |
| said, you are unlikely to get rich doing this, but you | | | | That did not mean his pictures were worthless. But |
| might earn enough money each year to outfit with a | | | | picture editors might not see where you are coming |
| new high-end camera body, or that lens you | | | | from if they do not recognize the market that you |
| fantasize about but which you otherwise would | | | | are targeting. For this reason, it pays to figure out |
| never go so far as to buy. | | | | beforehand what is selling well before you submit |
| So why is it not possible to get rich selling your | | | | your first portfolio. After that you are likely to meet |
| photos? | | | | less resistance if you veer off in a slightly different |
| It is simply a matter of numbers. Most of the popular | | | | direction. |
| online image exchanges - the ones that will allow | | | | It is also a good idea to specialize the themes of |
| anyone capable of creating quality photos to upload | | | | your photography. If you take particularly good |
| their material and license it out - sell images for about | | | | landscape shots, and build a body of landscape |
| a dollar a piece, and of that they will pay you | | | | images, your clients will be impressed by your body |
| perhaps 25 cents (maybe 50 cents if you are really | | | | of work when they are selecting that first image of |
| lucky). If you are thinking that this is a pretty poor | | | | yours, and they will likely seek you out again when |
| deal for the photographer, you are right. But this | | | | they require a similar image. |
| does seem to be par for the course, so there may | | | | Other online image exchanges that operate in a |
| be some operational expenses to running an image | | | | fashion similar to iStockPhoto include Fotolia, |
| exchange that are not immediately obvious. Either | | | | ShutterStock, and DreamsTime. All are worth |
| way, that's the current reality of the business. | | | | checking out. They are free to join and take a |
| So let's consider the numbers again. The reason that | | | | commission on your licensed images. |
| images typically sell for a dollar is that the buyers are | | | | Another tack you can take, if you don't like the idea |
| webmasters looking for low resolution filler images | | | | of licensing your images so cheaply, is to go with an |
| for their web properties. They will happily fork over | | | | online photographic service that allows you to set |
| one or two dollars for an image, but would frown at | | | | your own pricing. These are a little harder to find. |
| paying five dollars. You may get hundreds of people | | | | One such site is PhotoStockPlus which targets event |
| willing to pay you a dollar for an image before you | | | | photographers. If you photograph weddings, parties, |
| can find a couple willing to pay five dollars for a high | | | | special occasions, then you are their primary |
| resolution version that could be printed on a coffee | | | | demographic. |
| mug. You will find even fewer buyers - magazine and | | | | PhotoStockPlus offers a subscription service and |
| book picture editors, and the like - who are prepared | | | | gives you your own little e-commerce store where |
| to pay twenty dollars for the highest available | | | | you can sell plain photographic prints, as well as have |
| resolution version. | | | | them emblazoned across, for example, a T-shirt, a |
| So you will make your money from the masses, and | | | | coffee mug, or a mouse pad. The idea is that you |
| at 25 cents a pop you will need 4000 licensed | | | | add a markup on top of the wholesale price that |
| instances of your images before the image exchange | | | | PhotoStockPlus charges for supplying these items |
| will cut your first check for $1000. You might manage | | | | with your images on them, and that markup is |
| this by uploading 100 images that average 40 | | | | passed onto your clients. All you do is upload the |
| downloads, or you might upload just 4 mind-blowing | | | | photos, set the markups, and then point people |
| images that average 1000 downloads a piece. It will | | | | toward the site. The rest is hands-off. The cost of |
| come as no surprise that most people make their | | | | the service to you is reasonable, with rates that |
| money by creating as many good photographs as | | | | start at less than $30/month. |
| they can. They do not rely on their ability to | | | | Regardless of the route you take to monetize your |
| generate that rare master photo that everybody | | | | photography, actually doing something about it makes |
| must have. | | | | a lot of sense. You can either let your best images |
| Most of the online image exchanges will reject your | | | | sit on your PC year after year, where they will likely |
| images if they do not meet the high standards that | | | | get lost in the course of time, or you can put them |
| the exchange has set for itself. So be smart and | | | | out into the world where they will have a chance to |
| peruse the exchanges to get an idea of the quality | | | | earn you both a little fame and some recurring |
| that is required. Your images, in addition to being | | | | income. |